Supplier quote comparison
Compare two supplier offers on the same purchase quantity and cost basis.
ProcurementCompare in-house and purchased supply costs for one planning period, including a feasible continuous cost crossover when one exists.
Compare in-house and purchased supply costs for one planning period, including a feasible continuous cost crossover when one exists.
A continuous cost crossover is not a capacity check or a sourcing recommendation. Exclude sunk and unavoidable costs.
Use only costs that differ between the alternatives over the same horizon and scope. A continuous crossover is reported only if unit-cost slopes differ and the calculated volume is nonnegative. Equal slopes have no unique crossover; identical cost lines tie at every volume. A fractional crossover is not a whole-unit order instruction.
Compare the entered fixed and variable cost structures over a relevant volume range. A crossover identifies where the arithmetic preference changes under those assumptions.
Check available capacity, quality, intellectual property, continuity, and switching effort separately. An irrelevant or negative crossover is not a feasible production plan. Fixed costs that remain after outsourcing should not be presented as avoidable savings.
Exclude sunk or unavoidable allocated costs. Confirm capacity, quality, lead time, intellectual property, supply continuity, logistics, and relevant opportunity costs separately. A lower entered cost is not a sourcing recommendation.
Parallel cost lines have no unique crossover. A negative crossover lies outside the nonnegative-volume model. Dollar comparisons at your entered volume still work in both cases.
No. Include avoidable or otherwise relevant costs that change between alternatives. Unchanged allocations and sunk costs can distort the decision.